Classification of biodiversity

Understandings:
• The binomial system of names for species is universal among biologists and has been agreed and developed at a series of congresses.
• When species are discovered they are given scientific names using the binomial system.
• Taxonomists classify species using a hierarchy of taxa.

• The principal taxa for classifying eukaryotes are kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and species.
• In a natural classification, the genus and accompanying higher taxa consist of all the species that have evolved from one common ancestral species.
• Taxonomists sometimes reclassify groups of species when new evidence shows that a previous taxon contains species that have evolved from different ancestral species.
• Natural classifications help in identification of species and allow the prediction of characteristics shared by species within a group.

• All organisms are classified into three domains.
• Archaea, eubacteria and eukaryote should be used for the three domains.
• Members of these domains should be referred to as archaeans, bacteria and eukaryotes.

Application: Recognition features of
bryophyta, filicinophyta, coniferophyta
and angiospermophyta.

Know which plant phyla have vascular tissue, but other internal details are not required.

Application: Classification of one plant and one animal species from domain to species level.

Application: Recognition features of porifera, cnidaria, platyhelmintha,
annelida, mollusca, arthropoda and chordata.

Recognition features expected for the selected animal phyla are those that are most useful in distinguishing the groups from each other and full descriptions of the characteristics of each phylum are not needed.

Application: Recognition of features of birds, mammals, amphibians, reptiles
and fish.





hehe....which zodiac year are you?
Picture
Theory of knowledge:
• The adoption of a system of binomial nomenclature is largely due to Swedish
botanist and physician Carolus Linnaeus (1707–1778). Linnaeus also defined
four groups of humans, and the divisions were based on both physical and
social traits. By 21st-century standards, his descriptions can be regarded as
racist. How does the social context of scientific work affect the methods
and findings of research? Is it necessary to consider the social context when
evaluating ethical aspects of knowledge claims?